Tom Purcell, 1/10/2011 [Archive]

Earmarks Miss The Mark

Earmarks Miss the Mark

By Tom Purcell

The USA Today article almost caused me to drive off a bridge to nowhere.

Our government can't even squander our money efficiently -- particularly where earmarks are concerned.

Earmarks, says, "are government funds that are allocated by a legislator for a particular pet project, often without proper review."

Often slipped into large authorization bills -- or the 13 appropriation bills that fund the federal government every year -- earmarks tend to be concealed.

Though they account for roughly $20 billion a year in spending -- a pittance in our roughly $4 trillion budget -- some argue they are dangerous because they can be used to persuade legislators to support massive bills that do spend serious money.

Such as last year's stimulus and health care bills.

In any event, here's what USA Today's exhaustive investigation found: Our government can't even spend earmark dough efficiently.

Money set aside to fund some 7,374 congressional earmarks has not been spent in full -- and dough set aside to fund some 3,649 earmarks hasn't been spent at all.

Why? There are some legitimate reasons -- a state may have canned a project, for instance -- but in many cases it is bureaucratic red tape.

USA Today cites one example in which an Ohio congressman drafted a $375,000 earmark to "improve State Road 31" in Columbus when he meant to fund "U.S. 31." His minor error has tied up that earmark dough for 13 years -- and counting.

Botched earmarks are so widespread, says the paper, that one of every three highway dollars earmarked since 1991 -- some $13 billion total -- is still tied up.

But the red tape gets "better" yet.

Even if a particular state has not received a penny from botched earmarks, those earmarks still count against that state's share of federal highway funds.

USA Today offers an interesting example of how this works.

When President Obama was a U.S. senator from Illinois in 2005, he earmarked $1 million for a highway underpass in Chicago.

Obama's former chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, then a congressman from Illinois, earmarked $928,000 for the same project.

But state and local governments had begun building the underpass BEFORE Obama and Emanuel slipped in their earmarks -- and earmarks can't be used AFTER a project has been approved.

Though the earmarked $1.9 million could not be spent, Illinois saw its share of federal highway funding reduced by a corresponding $1.9 million that year.

Rather than bringing their state nearly $2 million, Obama and Emanuel cost it nearly $2 million.

The USA Today report on earmarking sheds light on an idea that is simple common sense to many: Why the heck is our federal government meddling with so much?

Lots of highways and bridges are in need of repair across America. It is governments' role to fund them.

But ought not state and local governments be making these decisions?

Why are we sending the lion's share of our taxes to the federal government, whose crafty legislators and bureaucrats use our own dough to force our state and local governments to bend to their will -- or have the funding withheld?

And so it is that the federal government has the power to persuade us to drive dinky little cars, not build roads where they need to be built and meddle in all kinds of ways that drive up costs and limit commonsense transportation solutions.

Who are the feds to boss us around when they can't even squander earmark money efficiently?

© 2011 Tom Purcell. Tom Purcell, a freelance writer is also a humor columnist for the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, and is nationally syndicated exclusively by Cagle Cartoons newspaper syndicate. For more info contact Sales at (805) 969-2829 or email E-mail Tom at

RESTRICTIONS: Tom Purcell's column may not be reprinted in general circulation print media in Pennsylvania's Allegheny, Beaver, Butler, and Westmoreland Counties. It may appear only in the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review and its sister publications.

Download Tom Purcell's color photo - Download Tom Purcell's black and white mug shot photo
Why not run a cartoon with the column? We recommend the cartoons below as a good compliment to Tom Purcell's topic.
Click on the thumbnail images to preview and download the cartoons.

Related Cartoons

 Con  Gavel-Ready Job COLOR
By: Nate Beeler

January 5, 2011

 Con  Gavel-Ready Job
By: Nate Beeler

January 5, 2011

Cutting the Government
By: Adam Zyglis

November 3, 2010

Earmark Museum
By: John Darkow

March 13, 2009

 Lib  Earmarks COLOR
By: Bob Englehart

April 21, 2010

 Lib  Earmarks
By: Bob Englehart

April 21, 2010

Fiscal Insanity COLOR
By: Jeff Parker
Florida Today
November 12, 2010

Fiscal Insanity
By: Jeff Parker
Florida Today
November 12, 2010

 Con  Obama and spending
By: Eric Allie

January 27, 2010

 Con  Obama and spending COLOR
By: Eric Allie

January 27, 2010

We do not accept and will not review unsolicited submissions from cartoonists.
Sales & Information: (805) 969-2829
Billing Information: (805)
Technical Support:

FREE cartoons for your website if you're already a paying print subscriber!
Artwork and columns are copyrighted by each creator. All Rights Reserved. Unauthorized reproduction prohibited. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service